Tato práce kriticky rozebírá dílo Foe, jehož autorem je J. M. Coetzee. Foe je postmoderní román, ve kterém se Coetzee vrací k novele Robinson Crusoe od Daniela Defoea. Coetzee zde představuje alternativní verzi Defoeava příběhu, verzi, jež přináší několik zajímavých změn, které poukazují na určité úpravy, které Defoe záměrně provedl u původního románu. Práce analyzuje hlavní spojitosti Defoeova a Coetzeeho románu a dále se zaměřuje na rozbor dvou hlaních postav. Druhá polovina práce je věnována problematice autorství, která je s tímto dílem úzce spjata. V závěrečné části je analyzována řeč, jež byla přednesena při předávání Nobelovy ceny za literaturu právě za toto dílo (Foe).
Anotace v angličtině
This thesis critically analyzes the novel Foe, written by J. M. Coetzee. Foe is a postmodern novel in which Coetzee goes back to the novel Robinson Crusoe by Daniel Defoe. Coetzee presents an alternative version of Defoe´s story. His version brings up many interesting alterations which point to some suspicious adjustements Defoe might have made to a different story. Coetzee suggests that Defoe, as a white, male writer has neglected the story of Susan Barton and of Friday. This work analyzes the main connections between Defoe´s and Coetzee´s versions. It focuses on the two main characters of the novel, the problem of authorship and the analysis of the Nobel lecture He and His Man presented by J. M. Coetzee.
Klíčová slova
Foe, autorství, J. M. Coetzee, Robinson, Defoe
Klíčová slova v angličtině
Foe, autorship, J. M. Coetzee, Robinson, Defoe
Rozsah průvodní práce
49 s.
Jazyk
AN
Anotace
Tato práce kriticky rozebírá dílo Foe, jehož autorem je J. M. Coetzee. Foe je postmoderní román, ve kterém se Coetzee vrací k novele Robinson Crusoe od Daniela Defoea. Coetzee zde představuje alternativní verzi Defoeava příběhu, verzi, jež přináší několik zajímavých změn, které poukazují na určité úpravy, které Defoe záměrně provedl u původního románu. Práce analyzuje hlavní spojitosti Defoeova a Coetzeeho románu a dále se zaměřuje na rozbor dvou hlaních postav. Druhá polovina práce je věnována problematice autorství, která je s tímto dílem úzce spjata. V závěrečné části je analyzována řeč, jež byla přednesena při předávání Nobelovy ceny za literaturu právě za toto dílo (Foe).
Anotace v angličtině
This thesis critically analyzes the novel Foe, written by J. M. Coetzee. Foe is a postmodern novel in which Coetzee goes back to the novel Robinson Crusoe by Daniel Defoe. Coetzee presents an alternative version of Defoe´s story. His version brings up many interesting alterations which point to some suspicious adjustements Defoe might have made to a different story. Coetzee suggests that Defoe, as a white, male writer has neglected the story of Susan Barton and of Friday. This work analyzes the main connections between Defoe´s and Coetzee´s versions. It focuses on the two main characters of the novel, the problem of authorship and the analysis of the Nobel lecture He and His Man presented by J. M. Coetzee.
Klíčová slova
Foe, autorství, J. M. Coetzee, Robinson, Defoe
Klíčová slova v angličtině
Foe, autorship, J. M. Coetzee, Robinson, Defoe
Zásady pro vypracování
1. Go through the novel Foe and notice and explain parallels with Defoe´s Robinson Crusoe.
2. The character of Susan Barton, what she represents and her possible representation in the real world and the world of the novel.
3. The character of Friday and possible meanings of his behaviour.
4. Find and analyse possible interpretations of who is really telling the story, who is Foe?
5. The role of authorship and its issue in Foe.
6. Interpret Coetzee´s nobel speech lecture He and His Man.
Zásady pro vypracování
1. Go through the novel Foe and notice and explain parallels with Defoe´s Robinson Crusoe.
2. The character of Susan Barton, what she represents and her possible representation in the real world and the world of the novel.
3. The character of Friday and possible meanings of his behaviour.
4. Find and analyse possible interpretations of who is really telling the story, who is Foe?
5. The role of authorship and its issue in Foe.
6. Interpret Coetzee´s nobel speech lecture He and His Man.
Seznam doporučené literatury
Atlas, James. "When an Original Idea Sounds Really Familiar." The New York Times July 28 1991. Web.
Barthes, Rolland."The Death of the Author". Translated by Richard Howard. 1967. Web. Retrieved from: http://www.tbook.constantvzw.org/wp-content/death_authorbarthes.pdf. 15 June 2016
Begam, Richard, and J. M. Coetzee. "An Interview with J. M. Coetzee". Contemporary Literature 33.3 (1992): 419431. Web...
Caracciolo, Marco. J. M. Coetzee's Foe and the Embodiment of Meaning. Jml: Journal of Modern Literature [online]. 2012, 36(1), 90 [cit. 2016-03-06]. DOI: 10.2979/jmodelite.36.1.90. ISSN 0022281X.
Coetzee, J. M. Foe. New York:Viking Penguin INC, 1986, ISBN 0670813982
Coetzee J. M. - Nobel Lecture: He and His Man". Nobelprize.org. Nobel Media AB 2014. Web. 08 July 2016.
Coetzee J. M. " J.M. Coetzee - He and His Man (Nobel Lecture)" Online video clip. YouTube. YouTube, uploaded by KXM.10 July 2013. Web. 28 July 2016.
Defoe, Daniel. Robinson Crusoe. Germany: Bancroft Books, 1969, 430000642
Doležel, Lubomír. Heterocosmica: fikce a možné světy. V Praze: Karolinum, 2003. ISBN 80-246-0735-2
Garber, Marjorie. "" " (Quotation Marks)." Critical Inquiry 25.4 (1999): 653-79. Web.
Goldstein, Paul. "Copyright." Law and Contemporary Problems 55.2 (1992): 79-91. Web.
Grieve, Dawn. Confrontation and Identity in the Fiction of J. M. Coetzee. Edith Cowan University: Library Archives, 1999. Web. Retrieved from http://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses/1246
Head, Dominic. The Cambridge introduction to J.M. Coetzee. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009, ISBN 0521687098
Howard, Rebecca Moore. "Plagiarisms, Authorships, and the Academic Death Penalty." College English 57.7 (1995): 788-806. Web.
Macaskill, Brian, and Jeanne Colleran. "Reading History, Writing Heresy: The Resistance of Representation and the Representation of Resistance in J. M. Coetzee's "foe"". Contemporary Literature 33.3 (1992): 432457. Web.
Maher, Susan M. Confronting Authority: "J.M. Coetzee's Foe and the Remaking of Robinson Crusoe". The International Fiction Review 18.1 (1991): 34-40. Web
Meskell, Lynn, and Lindsay Weiss. "Coetzee on South Africa's Past: Remembering in the Time of Forgetting". American Anthropologist 108.1 (2006): 8899. Web.
Murdoch, Jim. "Foe."The Truth about Lies. Jim Murdoch blogspot, 19 October 2009 . Web. 18 Jan. 2016.
Parker, Jo Alison." Crusoe's Foe, Foe's Cruso, and the Origins and Future of the Novel". KronoScope, Volume 11, Issue 1-2 (2011):17-40. Web.
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty."Theory in the Margin: Coetzee's Foe Reading Defoe's "Crusoe/Roxana"". English in Africa, Vol. 17, No. 2 (Oct., 1990), pp. 1-23. Web.
Turk, Tisha. Intertextuality and the Collaborative Construction of Narrative: J. M. Coetzee's 'Foe'. Narrative [online]. 2011, 19(3), 295 [cit. 2016-03-06]. ISSN 10633685
Seznam doporučené literatury
Atlas, James. "When an Original Idea Sounds Really Familiar." The New York Times July 28 1991. Web.
Barthes, Rolland."The Death of the Author". Translated by Richard Howard. 1967. Web. Retrieved from: http://www.tbook.constantvzw.org/wp-content/death_authorbarthes.pdf. 15 June 2016
Begam, Richard, and J. M. Coetzee. "An Interview with J. M. Coetzee". Contemporary Literature 33.3 (1992): 419431. Web...
Caracciolo, Marco. J. M. Coetzee's Foe and the Embodiment of Meaning. Jml: Journal of Modern Literature [online]. 2012, 36(1), 90 [cit. 2016-03-06]. DOI: 10.2979/jmodelite.36.1.90. ISSN 0022281X.
Coetzee, J. M. Foe. New York:Viking Penguin INC, 1986, ISBN 0670813982
Coetzee J. M. - Nobel Lecture: He and His Man". Nobelprize.org. Nobel Media AB 2014. Web. 08 July 2016.
Coetzee J. M. " J.M. Coetzee - He and His Man (Nobel Lecture)" Online video clip. YouTube. YouTube, uploaded by KXM.10 July 2013. Web. 28 July 2016.
Defoe, Daniel. Robinson Crusoe. Germany: Bancroft Books, 1969, 430000642
Doležel, Lubomír. Heterocosmica: fikce a možné světy. V Praze: Karolinum, 2003. ISBN 80-246-0735-2
Garber, Marjorie. "" " (Quotation Marks)." Critical Inquiry 25.4 (1999): 653-79. Web.
Goldstein, Paul. "Copyright." Law and Contemporary Problems 55.2 (1992): 79-91. Web.
Grieve, Dawn. Confrontation and Identity in the Fiction of J. M. Coetzee. Edith Cowan University: Library Archives, 1999. Web. Retrieved from http://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses/1246
Head, Dominic. The Cambridge introduction to J.M. Coetzee. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009, ISBN 0521687098
Howard, Rebecca Moore. "Plagiarisms, Authorships, and the Academic Death Penalty." College English 57.7 (1995): 788-806. Web.
Macaskill, Brian, and Jeanne Colleran. "Reading History, Writing Heresy: The Resistance of Representation and the Representation of Resistance in J. M. Coetzee's "foe"". Contemporary Literature 33.3 (1992): 432457. Web.
Maher, Susan M. Confronting Authority: "J.M. Coetzee's Foe and the Remaking of Robinson Crusoe". The International Fiction Review 18.1 (1991): 34-40. Web
Meskell, Lynn, and Lindsay Weiss. "Coetzee on South Africa's Past: Remembering in the Time of Forgetting". American Anthropologist 108.1 (2006): 8899. Web.
Murdoch, Jim. "Foe."The Truth about Lies. Jim Murdoch blogspot, 19 October 2009 . Web. 18 Jan. 2016.
Parker, Jo Alison." Crusoe's Foe, Foe's Cruso, and the Origins and Future of the Novel". KronoScope, Volume 11, Issue 1-2 (2011):17-40. Web.
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty."Theory in the Margin: Coetzee's Foe Reading Defoe's "Crusoe/Roxana"". English in Africa, Vol. 17, No. 2 (Oct., 1990), pp. 1-23. Web.
Turk, Tisha. Intertextuality and the Collaborative Construction of Narrative: J. M. Coetzee's 'Foe'. Narrative [online]. 2011, 19(3), 295 [cit. 2016-03-06]. ISSN 10633685