|
Lecturer(s)
|
-
Drška Václav, doc. PhDr. Ph.D.
-
Fukala Radek, prof. PhDr. Ph.D.
-
Hes Milan, Mgr. Ph.D.
-
Holý Martin, prof. PhDr. Ph.D.
-
Honys Vít, PhDr.
-
Hrbek Filip, PhDr.
-
Kaiserová Kristina, doc. PhDr. CSc.
-
Koumar Jiří, PhDr. Ph.D.
-
Krieger Miloslav, PhDr. CSc.
-
Märc Josef, Mgr.
-
Musilová Stanislava, Mgr. Ph.D.
-
Okurka Tomáš, Mgr. Ph.D.
-
Pátek Jakub, Mgr. Ph.D.
-
Peer Jan, Mgr.
-
Pernes Jiří, doc. PhDr. Dr.
-
Podroužek Kamil, PhDr. Ph.D.
-
Rokoský Jaroslav, doc. PhDr. Ph.D.
-
Royt Jan, prof. PhDr. Ing.
-
Skalický David, Mgr. DiS.
-
Šerberová Anna, PhDr. CSc.
-
Šimková Táňa, Mgr. Ph.D.
-
Tomíček David, Mgr. Ph.D.
-
Trefný Martin, Dr. habil. PhDr. Ph.D.
-
Urlich Petr, prof. Ing. arch. CSc.
-
Veselý Martin, doc. Mgr. Ph.D.
-
Zábranský Vilém, Mgr. Ph.D.
-
Zemanová Marcela, Mgr. Ph.D.
-
Hrubá Michaela, prof. PhDr. Ph.D.
|
|
Course content
|
1. Characteristics of a thesis, examples of good and bad practices. 2. Presentation of individual topics by students (topic, sources, literature, method, structure of the thesis) 3. Presentation of individual topics by students (topic, sources, literature, method, structure of the thesis) 4. Preparation for the thesis defense. 5. Practical defense training, evaluation.
|
|
Learning activities and teaching methods
|
|
unspecified
|
|
Learning outcomes
|
The aim of the course is to enable ongoing consultation, discussion of the topics of individual theses, and review in the final stage of thesis preparation, which should contribute to the creation of optimal conditions for the production of high-quality final theses. During the seminar, students present their methodological approaches, interim results, and conclusions. An important part of the course is also preparation for the defense. At the end of the seminar, there is preparation for the defense, in which students present their work (sources used, research intent, results, etc.). In order to create space for the creation of final theses, teaching is concentrated into blocks, with the rest of the teaching time devoted to individual consultations and available to students for the preparation of their final theses.
The student is able to discuss current issues related to the creation of their thesis. They are able to present their methodological outputs, interim results, and conclusions of their work. They are able to defend their conclusions.
|
|
Prerequisites
|
Submitting a thesis to the STAG information system.
|
|
Assessment methods and criteria
|
unspecified
Presentation of the thesis proposal, methodological approach, and concept of the thesis; review of the schedule for completing the final version of the thesis; regular consultations with the thesis supervisor. Credit requirement: recommendation and approval of the supervisor based on a review of the progress of the thesis.
|
|
Recommended literature
|
-
? HOLOUŠOVÁ, Drahomíra. Jak psát diplomové a závěrečné práce. Olomouc. 1999.
-
BERGER, Stefan ? FELDNER, Haiko ? PASSMORE, Kevin. Jak se píšou dějiny. Praha. 2016.
-
BERGER, Stefan ? FELDNER, Haiko ? PASSMORE, Kevin. Jak se píšou dějiny. Praha. 2016.
-
ECO, Umberto. Jak napsat diplomovou práci. Olomouc. 1997.
-
ECO, Umberto. Jak napsat diplomovou práci. Olomouc. 1997.
-
HOLOUŠOVÁ, Drahomíra. Jak psát diplomové a závěrečné práce. Olomouc. 1999.
-
KUBÁTOVÁ, Helena ? ŠIMEK, Dušan. Od abstraktu do závěrečné práce: jak napsat diplomovou práci ve společenskovědních a humanitních oborech. Olomouc. 2007.
-
KUBÁTOVÁ, Helena ? ŠIMEK, Dušan. Od abstraktu do závěrečné práce: jak napsat diplomovou práci ve společenskovědních a humanitních oborech. Olomouc. 2017.
|